Dear Editor:
Having read Abby Morris’ Oct. 16 column, “WWF debate plan ignored by Bush, Gore,” I feel compelled to reply.
First, I must agree heartily with Ms. Morris in that the amount of voter apathy is appalling, as any democratic republic must live first on a politically active populace.
However, I also must disagree with her stand on the debates the World Wrestling Federation (aka the McMahon Holy Empire) has proposed.
Affectionately referred to as the “SmackDown! Challenge,” the planned debate between Bush and Gore, with Minnesota Gov. Jesse Ventura the moderator, has been ignored by both candidates.
At first glance, it appears that this would, indeed, be a great chance to speak to a “captive audience,” especially an audience of young people. Consider, however, that this challenge comes in a year when violence in the entertainment industry is under fire (and here’s the kicker) from both parties.
I’d like to make one thing crystal clear. I happen to be a wrestling fan. I mean, I enjoy seeing a man bombed through two tables as much as any red-blooded, college-age male.
At the same time, I disagree with some of the McMahons’ business practices. I personally don’t have a problem with wrestling shows, although I don’t know if I would let my (hypothetical) children watch them.
So, why should I say I’m not surprised that the candidates ignored the SmackDown! Challenge?
As I said before, the WWF is now a political hot potato. In an election year where a few percentage points matter, it would seem critical to gain every available vote – especially young votes. However, it is also critical to maintain whatever existing support there is.
In a climate wherein many parents are (perhaps understandably) paranoid because of the memorable school shootings, one doesn’t take such threats lightly.
Don’t get me wrong, it’s great the WWF has registered young voters. But I question the motives.
The WWF has enough clout to ensure, for the time, that it will remain a highly-rated cable television program, and that it will be able to dodge cries that it should change.
However, I’m sure the McMahons realize that it couldn’t hurt to have a large number of wrestling fans that are politically motivated.
Maybe I’m just being cynical, but an active body (of about 120,000 voters, Ms. Morris reports) of young people who happen to like wrestling are more likely to defend violence in entertainment.
So, maybe the Smackdown! Challenge isn’t as great as it first appears. And maybe the WWF’s voter drive is self-serving
R. Carico

Author