Dear Editor,Being both a food connoisseur and new to the area, restaurant reviews are a breath of fresh air, however, staff writer Regina Guerra lacks in writing etiquette.
In the tradition of ‘reviewing’, Mrs. Guerra fails to convince this reader to step foot into any establishment; instead, she allows herself to be the reviewed subject.
When I read the review of Johnny Brusco’s Pizza, I became instantly confused.
The article was packed with plenty of facts about Mrs. Guerra, including a story about a jacket, a trip to Germany and a pair of boots.
When I finally reached the small paragraph for Johnny Brusco’s, I had become concerned the establishment was a children’s play jungle.
I ask you, how is this article relevant?
The articles for Panera Bread and Miso Teriyaki gave jumbled, unstructured paragraphs of “things I like to do,” failing to call attention to the subject at hand, the food.
I offer my advice to write a restaurant review correctly, filled only with facts pertaining to atmosphere, pricing, taste, rating and then, a personal opinion.
-Theresa Jacobson
No Comment